Sexism in Schools: Separate but Equal?
In 1892, Horner Plessy, a "colored" shoemaker, was locked up in jail for sitting in the "White" car of the East Louisiana Railroad. With a series of failed appeals, the Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896 established that the principle "separate but equal" was legally valid in the United States of America.
It wasn't until 1952, over half a century later in Brown v. Board of Education, that the court finally decided that separate but equal was inheritantly inequal.
Now, with a twist it's happening all over again, only this time in reverse. It's been decided that "separate but equal" is fair, only this time it's not "white" v. "colored," it's "boys" vs. "girls." Public schools can now receive federal funding for same-sex classes, and even same-sex schools. It's not just for physical and sexual education anymore.
Is this a wise policy decision, or just sexism?
You can read the story, which Danacasso pointed out to us, at http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070125/ap_on_re_us/same_sex_schools
I've been trying for three days to come up with something poignant, clever, insightful, and moving about the passing of Robert Anton Wilson. For three days, I've failed. But I would be remiss if I let another day pass and posted nothing.
"First Cloned Cat has Kittens." And before that, two later-cloned wild cats had kittens. Real-life biology has once again passed science fiction. Some of you trekkers/trekkies might remember that in the original Star Trek's vision of two or three centuries from now, cloning was wraught with problems, often including infertility. Well, the future ain't what it used to be.